That sneaky Shrub Mc Chimpy has done it again. Just when we'd finally got everyone but a few malcontents agreed that "Bush Lied About Iraq" his minions dig up a load of dodgy evidence to the contrary. I mean, who do they think they are kidding? Obviously the Nut Houses and excitable Malkins and Powerliners have got their orders from KKKarl but really why do they bother?
The so called evidence they are crowing about is completely inadmissible by any reasonable person.
There are no anonymous whistleblowers!
No NY Times reporters!
Did they follow due process and get a court order? I don't think so.
Could the evidence be tainted? well Duh of course it could it all comes from some secret DoD agency no one has ever heard of. I mean isn't it just a wonderful coinicidence that in the first few pages of the 2 million items they come across this? do they think we are stupid?
And you know did they read Saddam his rights or get permission to search his files? do they have quotes from CIA officials? No and NO again.
Just because their tame lackey Stephen Hayes purports to show that
The discovery of the information on jihadist training camps in Iraq would seem to have two major consequences: It exposes the flawed assumptions of the experts and U.S. intelligence officials who told us for years that a secularist like Saddam Hussein would never work with Islamic radicals, any more than such jihadists would work with an infidel like the Iraqi dictator. It also reminds us that valuable information remains buried in the mountain of documents recovered in Afghanistan and Iraq over the past four years.
And, how come it has taken 3 years for this evidnce to come to light? obviously it takes a while to do the counterfeiting. This is a poor, crude effort compared to those documents St Mary Mapes found.